COMMENTS FROM STREET TALK NETWORK ABOUT THIS POST-

1. Do your own research on the information provided and then come up with your own conclusions.

2. This article contains many names and other information that can be researched.

3. Trust your gut feeling on information provided as this post may contain slanted information.

“Voice-to-Skull,” usually abbreviated V2K, is an internet-era term for the alleged transmission of speech, threats, commands, music, or other sounds directly into one person’s head without an ordinary speaker or implanted receiver.

The central finding of this investigation is:

A real and experimentally demonstrated phenomenon—the microwave auditory or Frey effect—can make a person perceive clicks, buzzing, knocks, and under specialized conditions speech-like information. Patents and military research concerning this effect are genuine. However, I found no independently verified public case proving that the government, police, neighbors, satellites, cellphone towers, or a secret network used such a system to conduct prolonged, individualized “Voice-to-Skull” conversations with a civilian.

That distinction is essential. The existence of the underlying physical effect does not automatically verify every allegation made about it.

1. What people mean by “Voice-to-Skull”

The label is used for several different claims that should not be lumped together:

The term “V2K” is not a standard medical diagnosis or a consistently defined engineering term. On different websites it may mean microwave hearing, “synthetic telepathy,” remote neural monitoring, “Voice of God,” directed-energy harassment, ultrasonic sound, or ordinary auditory hallucinations.

2. The genuine scientific foundation

World War II radar observations

People working around early radar equipment reportedly noticed unexplained clicking, buzzing or knocking sensations. The sound seemed to originate inside or behind the head and could sometimes be perceived by a person whom nearby people could not hear anything around.

These observations eventually led to controlled research.

Allan H. Frey’s experiments

American biophysicist Allan H. Frey published the landmark paper “Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy” in 1962.

Frey reported that:

• Pulsed
  radio-frequency energy could produce an auditory sensation.
• Subjects described
  buzzing, clicking, hissing or knocking.
• The sensation
  began immediately when the transmitter operated.
• It could occur at
  considerable distance from the antenna under experimental conditions.
• Peak pulse power,
  carrier frequency and modulation were important.
• Some people with
  conventional hearing impairment could perceive the effect.

The original peer-reviewed paper is available through the Journal of Applied Physiology.

How the effect apparently works

The leading explanation is thermoelastic expansion:

1. A short RF or microwave pulse is absorbed in tissue.

2. It produces an extremely rapid, tiny temperature increase.

3. Tissue expands briefly.

4. That expansion produces a pressure wave.

5. The pressure wave travels through the head to the cochlea.

6. The brain interprets the pressure wave as sound.

Thus, the brain is not functioning like an ordinary radio receiver decoding FM broadcasts. Energy is being converted into a physical pressure wave that stimulates the auditory system.

A 2022 scientific review observed that microwave hearing is an established nonthermal or minimally thermal sensory phenomenon, while warning that this does not validate the much broader claims commonly attached to “electronic harassment.” Read the NIH-indexed review.

What the experiments proved—and did not prove

They proved that appropriately pulsed electromagnetic energy can create an auditory perception without an external loudspeaker.

They did not prove:

• Remote mind
  reading.
• Satellite
  targeting of named individuals.
• Continuous
  communication at ordinary environmental exposure levels.
• Perfect speech
  transmission through every building material.
• Manipulation of
  memories or personality.
• Secret tracking
  based exclusively on someone’s thoughts.
• That every person
  hearing unexplained voices is being irradiated.

3. The Walter Reed speech experiment

The most frequently cited early “voice” experiment involves Dr. Joseph C. Sharp and Mark Grove at or in connection with the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research during the 1970s.

Accounts say that speech was converted into a series of microwave pulses. Pulses were reportedly triggered at particular points in the waveform, allowing a subject to recognize short words or digits.

Important qualifications:

• Much of what
  circulates online is based on later descriptions, especially psychologist
  Don Justesen’s discussion—not a complete publicly available Walter Reed
  experimental report.
• The demonstration
  involved highly controlled equipment and a cooperative, correctly
  positioned subject.
• Recognizing a
  small vocabulary in a controlled setting is very different from silently
  beaming natural, continuous conversation into an unaware moving person.
• Claims that the
  system could be “easily duplicated by ham-radio operators” are repeated
  online but are not established by an accessible, replicated
  safety-reviewed experiment.

Therefore, the Walter Reed story is credible as an early experimental demonstration, but internet accounts often enlarge it far beyond what the surviving evidence supports.

4. Genuine United States patents

Several real patents are regularly presented as proof of V2K. Two particularly relevant patents were assigned to the United States government through the Secretary of the Air Force.

US 6,470,214 B1

“Method and device for implementing the radio frequency hearing effect”

The patent describes encoding signals, including speech, on a pulsed RF carrier so that the RF hearing effect could produce intelligible subjective sound. It was filed in 1996 and granted in 2002. Read the complete patent.

US 6,587,729 B2

“Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect”

This related patent describes speech modulation and recovery through the RF hearing phenomenon. Read the complete patent.

Other patents

• US 4,877,027 — Hearing System: projects modulated high-frequency
  electromagnetic energy toward a person’s head to produce discernible
  signals.
• US 4,858,612 — Hearing Device: proposes inducing auditory perceptions
  for people with certain forms of hearing impairment.

What a patent proves

A patent proves that an inventor described a potentially new and sufficiently definite concept that passed the patent examination process.

A patent does not prove:

• The device was
  built.
• It worked at the
  range claimed.
• It became
  operational military equipment.
• It was deployed
  against civilians.
• Every claim in its
  description was experimentally demonstrated.
• A classified
  program necessarily followed from it.

Patents are significant evidence of technical interest and feasibility research, but they are not deployment records or victim lists.

5. Directional sound systems that are sometimes confused with V2K

LRAD

Long Range Acoustic Devices produce powerful, directional audible sound. They have been used for announcements, maritime warnings, crowd control and perimeter security.

LRAD is not literally voice-to-skull:

• It sends ordinary
  acoustic sound through the air.
• Other people in or
  near the beam may hear it.
• It can often be
  recorded with a microphone.
• Buildings,
  distance, wind and obstacles affect it.

Ultrasonic audio spotlights

Parametric speakers use ultrasound that demodulates into audible sound along a narrow path. A person standing in the beam can hear speech while someone a short distance away may hear little.

This can create the impression that sound is privately addressed to one person, but it remains an acoustic phenomenon. It may reflect from walls, and under appropriate conditions microphones can detect it.

Bone-conduction and near-field devices

Bone-conduction transducers can send sound through the skull, but they normally require physical contact or very close coupling. They are not evidence of long-range remote neural access.

6. Military interest and the “Voice of God” label

Military organizations have long researched nonlethal methods for:

• Crowd dispersal.
• Psychological
  operations.
• Directional
  warnings.
• Area denial.
• Communication in
  high-noise environments.
• Temporarily
  disorienting or distracting an adversary.

The phrase “Voice of God weapon” has been used inconsistently in reporting. Sometimes it describes:

• Directional
  loudspeakers.
• Psychological
  operations designed to make a message appear supernatural.
• Proposed
  microwave-auditory communication.
• Rumored military
  capabilities for which no operational documentation has been released.

A well-documented historical example of psychological warfare is broadcasting messages from aircraft, vehicles or concealed speakers. That can be deceptive and frightening, but it should not automatically be called microwave V2K.

7. MEDUSA

The Navy funded exploratory work called Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio, or MEDUSA. The idea was to investigate whether the microwave auditory effect could produce an uncomfortable sound sensation for crowd control.

The program is important because it demonstrates official military interest in turning microwave hearing into a practical system.

But it does not establish that MEDUSA became an operational speech-transmitting weapon. Researchers questioned whether a useful effect could be produced safely, reliably and at sufficient range without excessive RF exposure.

This illustrates the recurring engineering problem: a laboratory effect may be genuine while a practical, covert, precise, safe, long-range weapon remains extremely difficult.

8. Havana Syndrome is not automatically V2K

Beginning in Havana in 2016, American government personnel reported abrupt pressure, sound sensations, headaches, dizziness, balance problems and cognitive complaints. These became known officially as Anomalous Health Incidents, or AHIs.

A 2020 National Academies committee concluded that directed, pulsed radio-frequency energy was the most plausible mechanism among those it considered, while emphasizing uncertainty and limited data. National Academies summary.

Subsequent intelligence assessments were less certain. In January 2025, five intelligence agencies continued to consider foreign responsibility very unlikely, while two agencies judged that a foreign actor’s development or limited use of such a capability remained possible, with low confidence. No public intelligence finding proved a specific device or perpetrator. Associated Press report.

A 2024 NIH study did not find consistent MRI-detectable brain injury or broad biological abnormalities distinguishing the AHI group from controls, although it did not conclude that participants’ reported symptoms were imaginary. NIH-published study.

Most importantly, AHI cases generally involve sudden pressure, sound, vertigo, headache and neurological symptoms—not years of personalized conversational voices. Havana Syndrome therefore cannot responsibly be used as proof of every V2K allegation.

9. The Alaska father-and-son story

I searched combinations of:

• “Voice to Skull”
  and Alaska.
• V2K, father and
  son.
• Anchorage and
  microwave hearing.
• Fairbanks and
  electronic harassment.
• Social-media posts
  and archived references.
• Government FOIA
  logs mentioning Alaska or V2K.

What I could verify

A public comment attached to a January 20, 2025 V2K podcast was attributed to Robert Lopez, who identified himself as a “Targeted Individual in Anchorage Alaska.” He alleged that the technology was being used on him, his wife and people around them, including relatives. The comment is visible on the Spreaker episode page.

This is an identifiable Alaska allegation, but:

• It is a personal
  statement, not investigative proof.
• The page supplies
  no laboratory measurements, medical examination, police finding or
  independently verified device.
• The comment does
  not contain the complete father-and-son narrative you remember.

I also found:

• A public comment
  on an Air Force recruiting page alleging V2K harassment in Fairbanks.
• Defense Department
  and Interior Department FOIA logs containing requests for records about
  microwave hearing or V2K, including records associated with Anchorage
  addresses or requesters.
• These logs prove
  that someone requested records; they do not prove the alleged technology
  was used.

Conclusion about the remembered post

I could not confidently identify the exact post about a son discussing his father in Alaska. It may have been:

• Deleted or made
  private.
• Posted in a
  Facebook group not indexed by search engines.
• Contained in a
  video rather than searchable text.
• Described using
  “microwave weapon,” “electronic harassment” or “targeted individual”
  rather than V2K.
• Confused with the
  Anchorage statement by Robert Lopez.

I would not invent the father’s or son’s name merely to complete the story. The Robert Lopez comment is the closest concrete Alaska lead I found.

10. Individual cases and allegations

These cases are important historically, but none proves covert V2K was used.

James Tilly Matthews — England, 1790s–1810

Matthews believed an “Air Loom Gang” operated a hidden machine that projected rays, controlled thoughts, introduced ideas and caused bodily torments. His account was documented in John Haslam’s 1810 Illustrations of Madness.

The case predates radio. It demonstrates that detailed beliefs about remote technological control existed long before microwaves, satellites or brain-computer interfaces. Modern historians often describe it as the earliest comprehensive account of an “influencing machine” delusion. Wellcome Collection records and medical-historical review.

Aaron Alexis — Washington Navy Yard, 2013

Before murdering 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard, Alexis told police that people were using microwave or extremely-low-frequency energy against him. He believed electromagnetic waves controlled or attacked him and reportedly heard voices.

He etched phrases including “My ELF Weapon!” and “End to the Torment!” on his shotgun. The FBI concluded that these were delusional beliefs and found no evidence of an electromagnetic attack. Reuters’ account of the FBI findings.

This tragic case is a warning against online communities reflexively confirming someone’s belief that unseen attackers are controlling them.

Myron May — Florida State University, 2014

Attorney and FSU graduate Myron May believed he was a “targeted individual” subjected to covert surveillance and mind-control harassment. He distributed material about electronic targeting before shooting three people at the FSU library and being killed by police.

Investigators found evidence of his beliefs but no device or government operation that verified them. Contemporary report.

Robert Lopez — Anchorage allegation

As discussed above, Lopez publicly alleged that he and his family were experiencing V2K. No independent technical or medical confirmation accompanied the post. It should be recorded as an allegation—not dismissed with ridicule, but not reported as proven fact.

Dorothy Szczepkowski — public submission to the White House

In material submitted to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Dorothy Szczepkowski described years of voices allegedly transmitted into her head and attributed them to named individuals.

The submission became part of a public government file, but its publication does not mean the White House verified or endorsed it. It is evidence that the complaint was submitted, not evidence that the alleged device existed. The material appears in the archived PCAST public comments.

Government FOIA requesters

Numerous people have requested FBI, Defense Department and other government records concerning V2K, microwave hearing and remote neural monitoring.

A FOIA log records:

• The wording of a
  request.
• The agency that
  received it.
• Sometimes the
  disposition or tracking number.

It does not establish that responsive operational records exist. Many internet lists mistakenly present FOIA requests as declassified confirmation.

11. Why hearing voices can feel completely external and technological

A person can genuinely hear a clear, distinct voice while no ordinary sound exists outside the auditory system. The experience is real to the person even when the suspected explanation is mistaken.

Possible causes include:

• Sleep deprivation.
• Severe stress or
  trauma.
• Hearing loss and
  tinnitus.
• Temporal-lobe
  epilepsy.
• Migraine
  phenomena.
• Medication
  effects.
• Stimulants,
  methamphetamine or other substances.
• Alcohol or
  sedative withdrawal.
• Fever, infection
  or metabolic illness.
• Parkinson’s
  disease or dementia.
• Mood disorders
  with psychotic features.
• Schizophrenia-spectrum
  illness.
• Hypnagogic or
  hypnopompic hallucinations occurring around sleep.
• Ordinary sound
  misperceived because of fans, air conditioners or other repetitive noise.

The World Health Organization recognizes auditory hallucinations and experiences of thought insertion, control or broadcasting as symptoms that can occur in schizophrenia and other conditions. That does not mean every unexplained experience is schizophrenia; it means medical causes must be investigated before assigning the experience to a secret weapon. WHO fact sheet.

12. What evidence would be necessary to prove an actual V2K attack?

A credible investigation would need evidence such as:

1. Independent measurements showing unusual RF pulses precisely correlated with symptoms.

2. Calibrated equipment operated by qualified engineers—not only a cellphone “EMF detector” application.

3. Repetition under controlled conditions.

4. Direction finding identifying a physical source.

5. Comparable measurements by separate laboratories.

6. Medical and hearing examinations ruling out common causes.

7. Recordings or sensor data with authenticated timestamps and chain of custody.

8. Recovery of a transmitter or documentation connecting it to an operator.

9. Evidence that the measured waveform could actually produce the reported speech.

10. Confirmation that observers did not know in advance whether the suspected transmitter was on or off.

Cellphone applications normally cannot identify specialized microwave pulses. A fluctuating meter reading near Wi-Fi, wiring or appliances is not proof that speech is being encoded into someone’s nervous system.

13. Final assessment

The evidence supports these conclusions:

• Microwave hearing
  is real.
• RF-induced clicks
  and auditory sensations have been demonstrated in humans.
• Speech-transmission
  concepts and genuine Air Force patents exist.
• Military
  organizations investigated possible nonlethal uses.
• Highly directional
  ordinary sound systems are operational.
• Havana Syndrome
  remains disputed and does not prove conversational V2K.
• No publicly
  documented civilian allegation I found has been proven by a recovered
  device, reproducible measurements and independent forensic confirmation.
• A patent, FOIA
  request or government-hosted public comment is not proof of deployment.
• Some highly
  publicized “targeted individual” cases ended in violence, making careful,
  non-inflammatory treatment of these reports especially important.

The most accurate position is neither “all of it is imaginary” nor “all V2K claims are confirmed.” The underlying auditory physics is genuine; the enormous surveillance-and-mind-control system described across the internet remains unproven. Individual experiences deserve respectful medical and factual investigation without automatically validating a potentially dangerous explanation.